Quoting Pawel Wiecek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
> On Mar 4, 10:16pm, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Such changes are always harmless, which explains why I safely consider
> > building NMU's for such issues even though they're obviously non critical.
>
> Just to clarify things a bit: no, they're not always harmless. They usually
> are, but this is not the case in _all_ situations.
Well, I think I've handled enough of such NMUs to know that adding
files to debian/po is anything but invasive.
>
> As for mp3info, I'll take care of this... I think.
Fine by me.
Attached is the patch I came up with as of now.
My proposal indeed drops the debconf note. It is talking about a
change that happened about 7 years ago if I'm correct reading the
changelog (which is not really helpful wrt this).
I also included a few fixes to lintian warnings:
* [Lintian] Spell GTK+ properly in the package description
See recent thread in -devel
* [Lintian] Add copyright information in debian/copyright
Grabbing copyright from the source
* [Lintian] Move the menu entry to Applications/Sound
There's not more "Apps" in menu
* [Lintian] No longer create empty /usr/share/man/man1 directory
fo mp3info-gtk
That package does not provide any man page
* [Lintian] No longer ignore errors from "make clean"
Very common fix: test for Makefile before running "make clean"
* [Lintian] No longer set debhelper compatibility in debian/rules
Use debian/compat instead.
Recommended practice
Alternatively, but I think it still would be a quite bad idea,
uploading with "just" the 3 pending PO files would be nearly OK for
me.
I'm subscribed to the package's PTS, so I'll follow uploads. I
currently drop the idea of NMUing.....and may come back on the package
in the next months in case no upload happened. At least, something I'm
sure of is that l10n bugs *will* be closed by lenny release..:-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
