On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 23:32 -0500, Rudy Godoy Guillén wrote: > You shouldn't need to mess with debian/copyright, since GPL license is > included in the system and you'll only need to refer to the file. I > don't see this as a strong argument. Anyway, I've changed my mind and > let be LGPL.
Thanks. Just to explain, LGPL would mean 1 line in debian/copyright, GPL would mean around 5 lines. > I'm afraid those both refer to the same. And actually this is common > on other quotes to the GPL. It took me some time to remember what was wrong there so I probably wasn't clear enough. The point was that the L in GPL is for License so the "GPL License" would mean "General Public License License" (like I said nitpicking). > I'm attaching the updated file. Sorry for the delay. The attachment seems to be missing. -- -- arthur - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
