* Cesare Tirabassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-06 19:43:41 CET]:
> On Thursday 06 March 2008 18:51:07 you wrote:
> >  If you are fine with just the short overview about the difficulty and
> > the amount of scenarios we have a deal. ;)
> 
> Certainly I wouldn't want want to have an 100 lines description, something 
> which is indicative of the theme of the campaign as well as the difficulty I 
> think is reasonable. In this respect the example from ttb seems to be right 
> on spot.

 I'll speak with upstream about "regulating" the length of the
description. Just a quick question, would you consider the nb
description to be too long? Or the sof one too special? Because well, I
do, for putting it into the package description... Yes, ttb is a good
example, but unfortunately they don't all follow that style.

> If this will be the only change than its no problem, we can simply sync it 
> since we are syncing already the 1:1.4-1 version:
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wesnoth/+bug/198202

 Ah, thanks to pochu. :)

> If its a new upstream version or if it contains added features I can 
> certainly 
> help you with preparing a FFe (Feature Freeze expection) request. Here is a 
> link to what we require (see the Universe section):
> 
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess
> 
> You may want to do it yourself of course, but if not, send me the .diff.gz(s) 
> or a link to them and I´ll be glad to help.

 I think that I should better leave that to you indeed. Not because of
not wanting to do the work but rather not really knowing the procedures
and requirements in there. 1:4-2 won't be a new upstream version, it
will be just a fix for this bug and the smallgui one (which would have
to go through the NEW queue in Debian so I will hand you the sources for
that once I got around and upload it).

 So long, and again, thanks for contacting us.
Rhonda


Reply via email to