On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Break? Or change? > > What would break? > > Break. For example scripts relying on mirrors_full being in the same > directory > as netselect is launched.
Hmm, good point. But it'd be better for scripts to explicitly request that behaviour. > > > > > > netselect-apt that often? > > > > No. Still, I'd like to keep my system clean and not discover files > > named mirrors_full in a random place on my file system. > > netselect-apt writes sources.list also to the current directory, so I'd say > it > is the same thing. Right again. Maybe it should be written to stdout by default? > > > > > > Creating an alias to netselect -i /tmp/mirrors_full isn't much work > either. > > > > I'm quite sure everyone forgets to do that before he runs it for the first > time. > > Point, I don't want to bikeshed here, I'll change the default behaviour after > lenny. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]