On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 03:35:15PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Michael Meskes wrote: > > This was part of the arrangement. > > jftr: nope; that's excately what was not part of the agreement, i did > specifically object to that (look for the reasoning i gave to dato on > #-devel; if you don't have the logs, i'll can send them).
Please read the whole backlog. An arrangement is more than just you statement. But we regress, I think we should move this discussion elsewhere. > because it didn't build anymore for me on i386 in the last days neither > with my debian derivated kernel, but for (seems to) for different > reasons (as in additional patches). and yes, if it doesn't build anymore > (with stock debian kernels), then it's serious. I agree. But it does build for me. Could you please check whether this is a local problem or a package one? Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
