Would Kumar like to adopt my package whose RC bug he has fixed? In December, Lucas wrote,
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package > failed to build on i386. Also in December, Kumar wrote, > Please find a simple patch to find size_t and fix > this FTBFS. Today, I finally turned attention to Kumar's patch, learning that Bart on Sunday had already applied and uploaded it. Lucas, Kumar and Bart, please accept my thanks respectively for finding, patching and closing this bug on my package debram. I appreciate the aid. Plainly I am no longer maintaining this package in a timely manner, so my question to Kumar is this: in December, were you merely hunting for random RC bugs, or have you developed an actual interest in the debram package? If the latter, if you wished to adopt the package, and if you understood (as one suspects that you do) what adopting this particular package would mean, then I would be amenable to turning it over to you. Please advise. This message is copied to A. Costa, who has a long-outstanding bug filed against the package and might be interested in the package's future (or, conceivably, might wish to take over its maintenance himself); to the relevant bug logs; and to Giacomo Catenazzi, who sponsored the package years ago. If Kumar (or one of the others receiving this message) were to take over the package, then I have some never-uploaded data updates that bring debram-data fully up-to-date at least as of the final r0 etch release. He might wish me to send these to him. -- Thaddeus H. Black 508 Nellie's Cave Road Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, USA +1 540 961 0920, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
