On 2008-03-12 12:30:15 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > (gdb) print *ximage > $1 = {width = 1187, height = 1483, xoffset = 0, format = 2, > data = 0x2aecbb8c1068 'ÿ' <repeats 200 times>..., byte_order = 1, > bitmap_unit = 8, bitmap_bit_order = 1, bitmap_pad = 8, depth = 24, > bytes_per_line = 5040, bits_per_pixel = 24, red_mask = 0, green_mask = 0, > blue_mask = 0, obdata = 0x0, f = { > create_image = 0x2aecbb4e0d30 <XCreateImage>, > destroy_image = 0x2aecbb4e1100 <_XDestroyImage>, > get_pixel = 0x2aecbb4e15f0 <_XGetPixel>, > put_pixel = 0x2aecbb4e1190 <_XPutPixel>, > sub_image = 0x2aecbb4e0f40 <_XSubImage>, > add_pixel = 0x2aecbb4e0bc0 <_XAddPixel>}} > (gdb) info locals > pixel = <value optimized out> > px = 0 > src = 0x2aecbbfe172e <Address 0x2aecbbfe172e out of bounds> > dst = 0x7ffff4b88c68 "" > i = 3 > nbytes = <value optimized out> > plane = <value optimized out> > > So, it seems that the problem comes from some function in > /usr/lib/ghostscript/8.62/X11.so (provided by the ghostscript-x > package).
With more details: 0x2aecbbfe172e (src) - 0x2aecbb8c1068 (data) is 7472838, while 5040 * 1483 is 7474320. So, if I understand correctly, the buffer provided by ghostscript is too small? -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)