On Saturday 15 March 2008 9:16:04 am Nikolaus Schulz wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 08:07:01PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > > It doesn't explain problem 1), though. Can you give an example of a > > > message which seems to be archived only with cutoff dates in the > > > future? > > > > I just tried -d 0, which yielded: > > > > File "/usr/bin/archivemail", line 1040, in is_older_than_days > > assert(max_days >= 1) > > I'm leaning towards an --all option for the sake of simplicity, while > allowing "-d 0" might still be useful for some situations. > But I just realize that you didn't answer my question. :-) Leaving the > '-d 0' problem aside, is your problem resolved, or are there still some > messages which don't get handled correctly?
Yes, the problem is resolved. Thanks, -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
