On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 04:56:18PM -0400, James Vega wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 08:21:24PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña > wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 01:11:56PM -0400, James Vega wrote: > > > This bug is still present[0] and is holding up an RC bug fix for > > > Snort[1] from propagating to testing. The problem looks to be two-fold. > > > > > > First, the check added in 2.7.0-9 to prevent building the documentation > > > will fail in dirty chroots. Since the latex packages take so long to > > > install and uninstall, it's not uncommon for the slower buildds to have > > > those packages pre-installed. > > > > There is no way I can prevent that, chroots should *not* run the binary > > target at all (just binary-arch). This is a flaw in the build environment, > > not in Snort. > > They don't run the binary target. They simply call binary-arch. The > binary-arch target has a prerequisite on build which then causes the > build-indep target to be run. I've attached a patch which fixes the > build. I had no intention of uploading as an NMU, I just used the > changelog to document the changes I made in the patch.
I've already uploaded a new version with a similar patch. I also found out the bug of snort-common files in the process. Regards Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature