Hi Scott,
* Scott Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-18 20:40]:
> On Tuesday 18 March 2008 07:10:47 pm Nico Golde wrote:
> > * supaplex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-18 20:05]:
[...] 
> > How do you think can I debug this? Again, your original top
> > output shows *two* openbox processes running which is not
> > possible unless your old X session didn't cleanly exit which
> > is not an openbox issue. Did you try the openbox version
> > from backports?
> 
> This is a new report.  I will try the backport and update you if it happens 
> again.  

Ok thanks a lot!

> You closed the old bug just before I was to follow up on it.  I've since 
> restarted my system anyhow.  I gave up on it until "next time" (which would 
> be now).

Ok so just to clarify, this is no behaviour you are able to 
trigger on purpose?

> The second instance from the old report didn't start until after I 
> opened a bug report.  Anyway, let's bury the old bug report.  I think it all 
> started after bzflag exited abnormally.

Ok. Please try the backport. If it has the same problem I 
highly doubt this is an openbox issue (sure I can still be 
wrong :). If not you have to wait for lenny cause I have 
really no idea what to do with this bug.

Kind regards
Nico
-- 
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.

Attachment: pgpxBOGbRyjl3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to