Package: slrn
Version: 0.9.9~pre97-1
Severity: normal

I don't know whether this is a new "feature", or one that has been
exposed by a recent change at google, but slrn now nags with:

Your message is not acceptable for the following reason(s):

    One word of the header is too long to get folded.

This message was generated while looking at the following line

References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sure it's long, and a weak violation of the RFC's, but the alternative
is to break the reference header altogether.  Since any half decent
software out there will be programmed competantly enough not to get a
buffer overflow when presented with a long header of this sorts, does
it really matter if we send out a header that is slightly too long?

This has been discussed in news.software.readers, but I don't know
what the long term plan is - I was under the impression that this had
been recently fixed, but then it seems that there were actually
several header-breaking bugs and this one might have slipped under the
radar.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.24 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages slrn depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.20     Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                         2.7-9      GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcanlock2                   2b-4       library for creating and verifying
ii  libslang2                     2.1.3-2    The S-Lang programming library - r

slrn recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
* shared/mailname: dirac.rather.puzzling.org
  slrn/manual_getdescs:
  slrn/getdescs: cron job
  slrn/getdescs_now: false
* shared/news/server: news.rather.puzzling.org
  slrn/lost_slrnpull:



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to