On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:49:01AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > I am not sure whether the ipfwadm package should be removed. Kernels up to > 2.4 still have support for ipfwadm filtering rules, so theoretically people > could still be using it with current kernels. > > cc'ing debian-devel. If the consensus there is that the package should be > removed, I'll request its removal.
_All_ kernel versions in sarge support ipfwadm. Not that I expect many people to use it, but I don't see a good reason for removing it. > --Adam cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]