Manoj Srivastava dijo [Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 01:57:30PM -0500]:
>         The question is not how many people have installed the package,
>  the question is how many packages on a given machine have the same
>  copyright, and thus would benefit by savings in disk space by bundling
>  them together
> 
>         This savings in diskspace is supposed to offset the fact that
>  the binary package alone is unusable, since it does not contain the
>  copyright; and that automated copyright file extractors get handed off
>  a pointer, not the actual copyright, which could be an issue.
> 
>         The rule of thumb I have traditionally applied is to see if 5%
>  of the source packages in the archive use the license under
>  consideration, and use that as a gating point.
> 
>         A better, though harder, test would be to poll actual
>  installations and see the disk saving that would result by bundling the
>  license, divided by the number of systems polled, but I do not know of
>  anyone actually conducting such a survey.

If 100% of Debian were to use the same license, we would be talking
about ~22000 license text repetitions. And imagine all of them were
GPL3 (the largest license in /usr/share/common-licenses) - That's
35068 bytes. Yes, that would amount to a whopping total of almost
735MB - Not at all something you can throw away, is it?

Well, but even if all of Debian were mutually installable (i.e. no
packages with conflicts: declared), how much space would _that_ take?
I don't dare to answer, but we were recently talking about the archive
size regarding CD image creation - We are at about 30 CDs now. 
I understand we are sticking with producing 650MB CDs and not larger
images as there are still media that big - and maybe some readers
which won't take larger disks? Never mind... 30 CDs is about
19500MB. We would be losing up to 4% bytes by mindlessly repeating
that single license... Maybe even less, as the CDs are gzipped (they
contain .debs after all).

On an installed system, you say? Well, I have no data, but I guess,
once uncompressed, it would not take less than 35GB. What's 730MB next
to that? Oh, and how long is the HDD in this very generic machine I
got about a year ago? Two-hundred-and-something GB. 

Of course, I'm playing with the numbers. There are still smaller
machines, there are the embedded-minded people, and of course, there
would be no sane way to verify the GPL3 was the same GPL3 all over if
we were to kill common-licenses - But basically, I'd not base the
definition in diskspace savings.

-- 
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973  F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to