* Reuben Thomas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
>> * Reuben Thomas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Eric Dorland wrote:
>>>
>>>> I couldn't reproduce this. I removed all the automake packages,
>>>> installed automake1.9, installed automake1.10 and then purged
>>>> automake1.9. The alternatives seemed fine.
>>>
>>> Add one additional step: after installing automake1.10, run
>>> update-alternative and choose 1.9. Then purge 1.9. The alternative (for me)
>>> remains set to 1.9.
>>
>> Can you send me the contents of your
>> /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/automake file?
>
> manual
> /usr/bin/automake
> aclocal
> /usr/bin/aclocal
> automake.1.gz
> /usr/share/man/man1/automake.1.gz
> aclocal.1.gz
> /usr/share/man/man1/aclocal.1.gz
>
> /usr/bin/automake-1.10
> 26
> /usr/bin/aclocal-1.10
> /usr/share/man/man1/automake-1.10.1.gz
> /usr/share/man/man1/aclocal-1.10.1.gz

I can't seem to reproduce this any more, are you still seeing this?

-- 
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to