Christian Perrier wrote on 31/03/2008 18:24:
Quoting Benjamin Seidenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Task #1: Implement IP stack on top of UDP for class
Task #2: Implement message passing in my mini-operating system for other
class
Task #3: Work on cyrus.

If someone wants to send me an all inclusive diff to avoid an NMU, I
will go ahead and use it and prepare an upload.


As neither the LSB header issue not the l10n fixes are urgent, I
propose you that I handle this just like a regular l10n NMU, including
a 10-days translation update round.

Then, instead of building/uploading the NMU, I send you the patch
(thus including the fix for LSB headers, the l10n changes and other QA
fixes I found...plus the needed debian/changelog entries, with the
Closes: statements)....and wait for a regular upload.

Would that fit with your own plans ?

It would be highly appreciated if any of your patches could be against the current SVN head (available at https://mail.incase.de/svn/cyrus22/trunk) where I could also grant commit rights to you if you tell me which username/password combo you want (by gpg encrypted mail).

Note that I just committed fixes for the following issues:
  * Fix init script LSB header (closes: 470110)
  * Update logcheck rules and the rule filenames (closes: 473526)
(Right before I got your mail.)

The galician translation update was already incorporated in the 2.2.13-13 upload. The portoguese translation already is in SVN anyway.

Any additional fixes are quite welcome.
Due to all the stuff I currently need to do I don't know when I will be able to build, test and upload a new package. I might be able to do that this week or next weekend, but I can't guarantee a thing.

Regards,
Sven

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to