Hi, > The new README you propose does not address the bug at all. All you > did was to copy the commandline recipe I used and write a README > around it.
I *fixed* your commandline recipe and wrote a README around it, that is a difference. > It also clearly shows that dpkg does not implement what this bug is > asking for; a command line recipe that will return a few false > positives is not the same as "dpkg already implements this" or as > "adding a --find-removed option to deborphan". dpkg -l | grep '^rc' is excatly what you asked for, the ^ makes the difference and prevents false positives, again: there are no false positives with this fixed command (^ matches the beginning of a line). So your justification "a command line recipe that will return a few false positives is not the same as ..", is not correct. If you think that deborphan should include a wrapper around dpkg -l | grep '^rc' please retitle this bug using a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the below-mentioned body and I will not close this bug by mentioning it in the README with the next upload: package deborphan retitle 389684 deborphan: Please add a wrapper around dpkg -l | grep '^rc' thanks Thanks for taking care about deborphan :) Carsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
