On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 02:29:06PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that is likely to
^^^^^^
> cause your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a
> pointer is greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64 and amd64.
Did you confirm that it's really like that in any way?
> Function `ldap_init' implicitly converted to pointer at etpan-ldap.c:127
> Function `ldap_get_values' implicitly converted to pointer at
> etpan-ldap.c:346
Alright, implicit conversions are often a bad thing anyway.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:17:49PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Since this is an RC bug, I've gone ahead and uploaded an NMU. This
> qualifies as a 0-day NMU, but since this bug has just been submitted
> and the maintainer is not on the LowThresholdNMU list, I've elected to
> upload to DELAYED/7-day instead. Patch is attached.
I am slightly offended by the rush of a "likely" problem here, doing it
within not even an hour, especially since it was also you who reported
the problem but originally calling it a likely problem which means one
should rather check if it's a real one.
This feels much more like anything but a hijack. Feel free to upload
with setting yourself as Maintainer too if you feel so strongly about
it.
Not amused,
Rhonda
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
