I absolutely agree. I recently checked, and I came to the same opinion, what can I do for it to be removed?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: silky > Version: 0.5.4-0.1 > Severity: serious > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: proposed-removal > > Dear Maintainer, > > While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible > candidate for removal from Debian, because: > > * Out of date. > * Buggy (1 RC). > * Low popcon. ~30 installs. > * RFH'd. > * Slow/inactive upstream. > > Bring it back in if upstream gets going? > > If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from > Debian, please reply to this bug and tell so. > > If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please > just close this bug and do an upload also fixing the other issues. > > If you agree that it should be removed, send the following commands to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (replace nnnnnn with this bug's number): > > severity nnnnnn normal > reassign nnnnnn ftp.debian.org > retitle nnnnnn RM: <packagename> -- RoM; <reasons> > thanks > > For more information, see > http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals > http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt > > Thank you, > > Barry deFreese > > > > -- VWOL Tamas SZERB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
