(taking unrelated bugs out of the loop.) also sprach Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.1957 +0200]: > * at S40 or so, you come along, see that /dev/md0 exists, and decide > not to do MAKEDEV
No, I come along at S25 and I do not give a flying food for whether /dev/md0 exists or not. I just create all /dev/md* nodes, regardless of whether some or all already exist, iff udev is being used. > Understood. I'm not a Debian maintainer, so none of the release > pressure is on me; if you don't have room to work on this option, > the alternative is fine with me. This patch is intended as > a fallback in case your earlier upload does not make it through > testing. It's intended to make it through testing. sarge will not release without mdadm, or when mdadm has an RC bug. > As a worst case scenario, you can degrade the bug to wishlist and > claim that users should do the auto thing in the config file. No, that's not an option. This is Debian, after all. :) > > Isn't --auto=yes intended to enable this but read the actual setting > > from the configuration file? I am not sure that your patch still > > allows this. > > You're right that we should look at this, for now that's completely > untested in this patch. > > I'll dive in and see if I can find out what's supposed to happen. Thanks! I think it would be best if you could file a new (wishlist) bug against mdadm and attach the patch to that, so that we can treat the two as separate issues. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! the best way to accelerate a computer running windoze is at 9.81 ms^-2
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
