also sprach Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.10.0948 +0200]: > Are you being presented with an editor at this point?
Yes. > Assuming you were being presented with an editor, this is due to > the changes requested in #402531 ("format commit messages better > for git"). The first full change is unfolded for use as a template > summary line and prepended to the full list of changes. An editor > is then spawned so that you can edit the summary as desired. This > is documented :-) Ah, okay... that makes sense and logcheck-database just isn't the best. Anyway¸ I am not sure I agree with the heuristics in general. debian/changelog isn't exactly suitable for git commit messages. But then I/we should really rather concentrate on generating debian/changelog from commit logs rather than the other way around. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "getting a scsi chain working is perfectly simple if you remember that there must be exactly three terminations: one on one end of the cable, one on the far end, and the goat, terminated over the scsi chain with a silver-handled knife whilst burning *black* candles." -- anthony deboer
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)