Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I also think that the "3.0 (git)" format would benefit from some further > work... for instance I'd like the git version to be added in a header in > the .dsc
What git version? Git repositories do not have a version number. > so that if Git's internal format changes in some incompatible way > it's possible to identify which source package use the old format. If git's "internal" (aka "external") format changes in some incompatible way, then every published git repo on the internet will be broken. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
