On Thursday 01 May 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > It should however then also update these preceding comments, and probably > the function itself should be renamed. I also miss some kind of error > handling in case grub-probe fails.
It should also probably be run using log-output so errors get recorded in the syslog. Looking at grub-probe I also think we might be able to further simplify grub-installer by calling it with a path instead of a device, but that can wait until later. Adding a comment for that could be useful though. > 3) does it also support gnu*, freebsd* and netbsd* host OS and, if not, > does it return an error; if not we should keep that coded in > grub-installer What about the hurd_convert function in grub-installer?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.