Pierre Habouzit dijo [Mon, May 05, 2008 at 03:44:15PM +0200]: > > So given that it's really from Lighttpd, and that it's likely that future > > version will come from Lighttpd as well, not cherokee, shouldn't we give > > Lighttpd priority? > > Well so maybe I'll take gunnar's manual page then :) > > Anyways, I don't care much. I'll use a priority of 20, the cherokee > maintainer can use whatever he thinks is best.
I'm using a slave alternative for the manpage, and I will be shipping both the binary and the manpage as spawn-fcgi.cherokee - Even if the manpage is the same today, nothing guarantees it will stay so. How should we close the bug? In rigor, the bug should be open until we _both_ upload the changed packages... So, should our changelogs refer to this bug, or should we close it manually later? Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]