On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:30:58AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:03:39AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:31:40PM +0300, Markus Laire wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'm not a maintainer, but I did have info that bug had not been
> > > dealt with, so I reopened the bug with that info.
> > 
> > I see that you sent info, but only to the BTS control bot, which prevents it
> > from being reflected in the bug log.
> > 
> > I suggest you re-send it.
> 
> Btw, as for this BTS ping-pong game, Max asked that you file separate bugs
> instead of reopening this one.  This doesn't sound like an unreasonable
> request, so why not just do that?

Robert, i don't really see the reason why this should be done.

> It's probably helpful to the maintainers to have a separate bug for each
> violation.  I can imagine that working with one [1] huge report while trying
> to actually fix stuff can be a PITA.

Well, i suppose that callign the reporter stupid, as max did is not
helpful also. Nor threatenenign me to be blacklisted from the BTS. Max
should really calm down, i know he is not agreeing with the firmware
split, but this doesn't allow him to be impolite and threatening.

I suppose the right way would be to split the bug report, and retitle it
for each actual violation case, but hey ...

> [1] well, actually a few merged reports, but it amounts to the same.

Sadly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to