On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:51:37AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> A quick glance suggests that the syntax is compatible at this point, is 
> that right? 

As far as I know, the only potential issue is that current mktemp will
happily go along with `mktemp -p /tmp blah.XX` and GNU mktemp will
complain that there are too few X's.  I can't imagine that there are
many people actually depending on this behavior, but maybe that's just
me.

I think that Jim alluded to a potential change in that department, but
I'm not sure what the status is or if it's important at all.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to