On 02/06/08 at 18:23 +0900, akira yamada / ?????? wrote: > Hi, > > > Such a layout only makes sense if someone want to coinstall ruby 1.9.0 and > > ruby > > 1.9.1: if we have only one dir (for 1.9), then won't be able to install two > > versions of the same lib (one for 1.9.0, one for 1.9.1). On the other hand, > > if > > a lib was ported to 1.9.0, it's likely to be easy to port from 1.9.0 to > > 1.9.1. > > So we could probably do that as Debian-specific changes if necessary. > > > > I think that this should be raised on ruby-dev@ (others are likely to run > > into > > the same problem). Akira-san, Daigo-san, could one of you ask for the Ruby > > developers' opinion? > > I asked about this change at [ruby-dev:32751] and [ruby-dev:32754]. > > * the change is for possibility of incompatibility. > [ruby-dev:32752] > * "1.9.0" as dirname may be kept if there is no incompatibility. > [ruby-dev:32759]
OK, thank you. So there's a few packages that need to be fixed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ zcat /org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/dists/sid/Contents-i386.gz | grep ^usr/lib/ruby/1.9/ | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq devel/rant interpreters/libgettext-ruby1.9 interpreters/libhtree-ruby1.9 interpreters/libncurses-ruby1.9 libs/libactiverecord-ruby1.9 libs/libactivesupport-ruby1.9 libs/libcairo-ruby1.9 libs/libflexmock-ruby1.9 libs/libgpgme-ruby1.9 libs/libhpricot-ruby1.9 libs/libopen4-ruby1.9 libs/libwww-mechanize-ruby1.9 net/libnet-netrc-ruby1.9 web/libfcgi-ruby1.9 -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]