On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 02:44:03PM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote: > I am really confused by that "ever". Are you suggesting that it > shouldn't have been there in the first place?!
No, it should be there because that is the intended behavior, but I don't particularly like it. > 2) Because sensible-browser is the only "browser" that is able to > respect the options of the admin and the users, no matter: > a) which browsers are installed on a system > b) how many users are present on a system > c) if X is used or not: Perhaps you would like to package browse and give it a high priority: http://www.dwheeler.com/browse/ > "When several packages all provide different versions of the same > program or file it is useful to have the system select a default, but > to allow the system administrator to change it and have their > decisions respected." So what is your suggestion? Raise the sensible-browser priority to what? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
