reopen 484379
thanks

2008/6/4 Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Source: extace
>> Severity: important
>> Version: 1.9.9-2
>> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Usertags: goal-dash
>>
>> Hello maintainer,
>
> Hi,
>
>> While checking for bashisms in debian/rules with checkbashisms (from
>> the 'devscripts' package) I've found your package making use of a bashism.
>>
>> checkbashisms' output:
>>> possible bashism in extace/rules line 105 (echo -e):
>>>                         echo -e "\n$$patch ($$author):" >> [EMAIL 
>>> PROTECTED]; \
>>> possible bashism in extace/rules line 112 (echo -e):
>>>                                 echo -e "\n$$patch ($$author):" >> [EMAIL 
>>> PROTECTED]; \
>
> Automatic bug report ?

No, manually filed. With data from lintian's lab (/org/lintian.debian.org/...)

> I don't have these lines on the rules file. My
> rules files doesn't contains hack like that.

Yes it does:

$ gpg --verify < extace_1.9.9-2.dsc
gpg: Signature made Tue 01 Apr 2008 16:52:20 CST using DSA key ID 1F41B907
gpg: Good signature from "Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg:                 aka "Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 1D7F C53F 80F8 52C1 88F4  ED0B 07DC 563D 1F41 B907
$ dscverify extace_1.9.9-2.dsc
extace_1.9.9-2.dsc:
      Good signature found
   validating extace_1.9.9.orig.tar.gz
   validating extace_1.9.9-2.diff.gz
All files validated successfully.
$ zgrep 'echo -e' extace_1.9.9-2.diff.gz
+                       echo -e "\n$$patch ($$author):" >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; \
+                               echo -e "\n$$patch ($$author):" >> [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]; \

(It is$ gpg --verify < extace_1.9.9-2.dsc
gpg: Signature made Tue 01 Apr 2008 16:52:20 CST using DSA key ID 1F41B907
gpg: Good signature from "Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg:                 aka "Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 1D7F C53F 80F8 52C1 88F4  ED0B 07DC 563D 1F41 B907
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ dscverify extace_1.9.9-2.dsc
extace_1.9.9-2.dsc:
      Good signature found
   validating extace_1.9.9.orig.tar.gz
   validating extace_1.9.9-2.diff.gz
All files validated successfully.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ zgrep 'echo -e' extace_1.9.9-2.diff.gz
+                       echo -e "\n$$patch ($$author):" >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; \
+                               echo -e "\n$$patch ($$author):" >> [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]; \


They are part of the patch-stamp target.

>
> Christian
>

Cheers,
-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to