Hi Thijs, * Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-05 11:35]: > On Thu, June 5, 2008 10:49, Nico Golde wrote: > > What is your argument against that? I think yes, for those > > who can include passwords this should be the case for the simple reason > > that this is the simplest solution for the problem. > > I'm not principally oposed to that but I think in that case we'd better > make it a policy change rather than to being filing RC bugs on any package > that could possibly have secrets in a configuration file.
I submitted a wishlist bug against the policy for this. Though having a policy statement about this would also result in an RC bug if it's violated :) Thanks for your input! Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgp6jfnf2of0P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
