On 2005-05-28 Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Andreas Metzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): [...] > > * Make login and su use limits.so PAM module by default > > Closes: #300720 > > breaks stuff like this: > > nice -n 19 su -c "somecommand" someuser > > because pam_limits.so resets the nice value to 0 even if > > /etc/security/limits.conf is empty.
> > See <http://bugs.debian.org/241663>. > Well, indeed. But, here, aren't we more the victims of #241663 rather > than the responsible for the change of behaviour ? > I'm considering reassining this to libpam-modules and merge it with > 241663 Hello, I'd appreciate if this bug could stay assigned to login for documentation purposes. I agree with you that the proper fix is to change pam_limits, however I doubt this is going to happen soon. - I'll leave up to your judgement whether you consider this issue or #300720 more important. thanks, cu andreas -- "See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf, fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha. Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash" http://downhill.aus.cc/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
