Hello,
Olivier Berger schrieb am Wed 28. May, 20:32 (+0200):
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.7.3.0
> Severity: minor
>
> In "Appendix G - Diversions - overriding a package's version of a file (from
> old Packaging Manual)", there's some misleading explanations on dpkg-divert
> preferred use in presint scriptsi (as I understand it, this is not related to
> policy itself, as it lies in the appendix, so this issue should be easily
> fixed ?).
>
> The following example is provided with a sentence which seems erronous to me
> ATM :
>
> if [ install = "$1" ]; then
> dpkg-divert --package smailwrapper --add --rename \
> --divert /usr/sbin/smail.real /usr/sbin/smail
^^^^By the way, the example should not suggest to use a fixed prefix, but the package name. Because there might be more than one diversion which would clash. Bye, Jörg. -- „Dass man etwas durchdringen kann, wenn man es durchschaut hat, ist der Irrtum der Fliege an der Fensterscheibe.“ (Nietzsche)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP
