On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 08:37:07AM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote: > It would be nice to be able to depend solely on darcs to do the right > thing and preserve times and permissions.
Indeed. > working directory. So it's possible to retrieve that data even when > darcs doesn't do that. At least when the repositories are local. Well, this is by no means a guarantee. Not only that, but even local repos may lose the permissions (for instance, if one used darcs get to make a copy of another one at some point). So I don't think this is really going to be a solution. > I wouldn't go to using --set-scripts-executable. That's just a > kludge. It is, but it does have the advantage that it works even when things are stored remotely. -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
