* Daniel Ruoso ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > BTW, > > I tested the patch (only with a little difference) and it not just only > worked, but it avoided the padding in cdrecord and it was many times > faster than the mpg321 version. > > The only difference was that I splitted the "-t cdr" parameter in two > lines, as I wasn't sure if passing it as a single parameter would cause > problems...
I'm away from my development machine for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to upload a fix for this. You're welcome to do an NMU if you will. Regards, Goedson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
