On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 09:10:00AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: [...] > >> > I think it should be worth mentionning that since 2.6.16, on > >> > some architectures, the kernel can be configured with high > >> > resolution timers which makes nanosleep(2) a lot more accurate > >> > and voids the first comment above. > > I've certainly verified this in 2.6.26-rc6. The question is exactly > when the change came about. [...]
Hi Michael, See: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6ba1b91213e81aa92b5cf7539f7d2a94ff54947c Cheers, Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
