"Also sprach Debian Bug Tracking System:" > On Dec 22, "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dec 22 07:01:33 betty udevd-event[13774]: udev_db_get_devices_by_name: no > > index directory '/dev/.udev/names/disk\x2fby-path\x2fpci-0.0-ide-0:0': No > > such file or directory > > > > when the \x2f bits in the message clearly indicate that it shouldn't be > > looking that up anyway. disk-by-* exist. > > Not a bug.
Please explain yourself a bit better (hmm .. in fact, at all!). > I get this message: > > Dec 22 07:01:33 betty udevd-event[13774]: udev_db_get_devices_by_name: no > index directory '/dev/.udev/names/disk\x2fby-path\x2fpci-0.0-ide-0:0': No > such file or directory > > when the \x2f bits in the message clearly indicate that it shouldn't be > looking that up anyway. disk-by-* exist. > > Can you check that this is as intended? Well? Do you intend to produce a message that something strange does not exist? What's the excuse? And why isn't it a bug to produce a message that complains that FOO\x2fBAR does NOT exist, when FOOBAR does exist? Surely it should either a) complain tha FOOBAR does not exist, if indeed it does not b) shut up > After the spurious message, things go as intended: > > Dec 22 07:01:33 betty udevd-event[13774]: update_link: found -1 devices > with name 'disk/by-path/pci-0.0-ide-0:0' Note! Correct name. So what was that laconic bit again? "not a bug"? Why not? In that case I think I'll send you a mail telling you that your mail to P\2xfT\2xfB has not been delivered! Maybe that'l jog the memory of what bugs are like :o). PTB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
