[Andreas Tille]
> I guess I should apply the patch modulo the Debug line
> "Testheader". ;-) I can confirm that the Enhances line from
> lang-nb-desktop was successfully propagated to debian-edu-tasks.desc
> (there is no other occurrence of Enhances) and thus I think I'll
> upload the new cdd-dev version. You should adapt your versioned
> build-depends in debian-edu if you want to make sure that the
> feature is really used.
Thank you. Done.
I noticed one thing while testing the new feature. I suspect we do
not want to generate metapackages (as in entries in debian/control)
for such enhancing packages. At least, I suspect we should have a way
to avoid generating metapackages for tasks.
Here is a draft patch doing that.
--- /usr/share/cdd-dev/cdd-gen-control 2008-02-07 11:52:38.000000000 +0100
+++ cdd-gen-control 2008-07-08 16:53:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@
sub gen_control {
my $task;
for $task (sort keys %taskinfo) {
+ next if (defined $taskinfo{$task}{Enhances});
print "Package: $task\n";
my $header;
Not sure if this is the best way to handle it. Perhaps better to have
a separate task header for this, like the leaf header used to control
tasksel tasks. What is your view on this?
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
