Hi, gconf-editor maintainer here :) Can you please check if german manual is updated? If so, I'd add it to Makefile.am in order to get it into the tarball.
Thanks On 6/2/05, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005, Keywan Najafi Tonekaboni wrote: > > I am talking about > > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gconf-editor/docs/de/ > > which is the translation of > > /usr/share/gnome/help/gconf-editor/C/gconf-editor.xml > > Well, the upstream tarball doesn't seem to hold your translation: > > bee% tar tzf ~/tarballs/gnome/gconf-editor/2.8/gconf-editor-2.8.2.tar.gz | > grep de > gconf-editor-2.8.2/data/gconf-editor.desktop.in > gconf-editor-2.8.2/data/gconf-editor.desktop > gconf-editor-2.8.2/data/icons/folder-closed.png > gconf-editor-2.8.2/data/icons/folder-open.png > gconf-editor-2.8.2/src/gconf-cell-renderer.c > gconf-editor-2.8.2/src/gconf-cell-renderer.h > gconf-editor-2.8.2/src/gconf-list-model.c > gconf-editor-2.8.2/src/gconf-list-model.h > gconf-editor-2.8.2/src/gconf-tree-model.c > gconf-editor-2.8.2/src/gconf-tree-model.h > gconf-editor-2.8.2/po/de.po > gconf-editor-2.8.2/po/de.gmo > > You said "it is checked in Gnome CVS and part of Gnome since 2.8.2", I > think upstream forgot to include that file when shipping tarballs. > > I presume some automake (Makefile.am) magic is needed, but this is an > upstream bug, not a Debian one. > > There's no problem with reporting upstream bugs via the Debian BTS, I > just want to make sure we're talking of the same thing: you do agree > that this is non-Debian specific? > > Bye, > -- > Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Neutral President: I have no strong feelings one way or the other." > > >
