Package: samba4 Followup-For: Bug #486370 (Messages sent only to the Debian BTS won't reach me until I get round to checking bugs.debian.org by hand. Please CC me, or maybe debian-l10n-english.)
> Thanks for the bugreport. I agree the references to LanManager are a > bit out of date, and are at least incomplete. I'll see if I can fix > this in the next upload. Thanks! > Samba 4 is not specifically aimed at supporting SMB2 however - it supports > SMB itself > just as well. SMB2 is also disabled by default. You're agreeing with me - it does specifically aim at adding support for SMB2 (I didn't say anything about _dropping_ support for SMB). > The other bit of your bug report appears to be about the Samba 3 > package descriptions, not about the Samba 4 ones. Correct; my bug report does admit this quite clearly, though I eventually come back to Samba 4 in the part that starts: >> Then the samba 4 package would be something like this: My point is that the fix may require coordination across the entire suite - unless the plan is for Samba 4 to replace Samba 3 early in Lenny+1, in which case just fixing Samba 4 would do. I could of course submit separate bugreports against each package, but would those be welcome when we're going into a freeze? -- JBR Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]