On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 05:48:43PM +0200, Philipp Sternberg wrote: > > On Tuesday, 22. July 2008, you wrote: > > what is your default shell? > > ls -l /bin/sh > > Hi.. oh it's dash actually... > > Ah... that looks much better!!! > I purged dash so that > > ls -l /bin/sh gave > > /bin/sh -> bash > > afterwards. > > That solved it! > > (The ramdisk image now contains udev!) > Maybe there should be a package dependency forbidding dash to be installed or > (if that is possible to be set as default shell... Where is that configured > anyway??) > > Anyway thanks a lot for your help and sorry for trying to set you on the > wrong > track (that function-script thing) I did obviously not interpret the doings > of that stuff correctly...
Mmm, is bash-dependency not supposed to be a bug, which we want to get ride of for lenny ? I remember mass-bug-filling for bashism or something. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
