On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 05:54:42PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 06:06:32PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>> Hmm, how long was this broken? I can't recall ever running into
>> this bug...
>
> It was never broken in any given coherent release, but I have a
> feeling that Peter installed current man-db on stable or on a rather
> old incarnation of testing.
Correct; the system in question was installed as Etch then
partially(!) upgraded to Sid.
>> On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 01:41:17PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>>> I don't really want to make man-db depend on this version of
>>> groff, though, as man doesn't require it during normal operations.
Would it be appropriate to do this?
Depends: groff-base
Recommends: groff-base (>= N)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
