Hi, * Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-25 11:12]: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:11:30 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > > Julien Cristau wrote: > > > AFAICT one option would be to turn that into a warning instead of > > > reject. Another is to have check_hash make the same checks as > > > Upload.check_dsc_against_db for orig.tar.gz files that already exist. > > > > The first is not an option, as we don't want to have broken checksums in > > the archive. > > yeah, good point..
Do you think this will be fixed before we release lenny? I mean now this only creates an unneeded workload because people ask for unblocks + we create DTSAs. If not I would stop building DTSAs until after the lenny release. I would prefer this being fixed though as everything else looks contra-productive to me. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgpStuHkWvK5B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
