-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 01:40:39PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: >I've got an improvement to package that i'm maintaining that would >benefit from adding this call. Is there a particular reason *against* >it? I don't see how adding a call would be detrimental to the packaging.
Please elaborate on this - perhaps even revealing the actual (packaging) code of yours. I might be interested in doing a kernel-module.mk snippet for cdbs, and suspect more could be automated than just the inclusion of that dh call. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkipx1UACgkQn7DbMsAkQLiyJwCfXIPdM+YB4FCDvCCqZfNrVf+m /ykAn3RQtE8xt9O02/g2RXHQmqvyjQcp =EhT0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
