On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Carsten Hey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 08:47:07PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > The apparent issue is a minor incompatibility (quoting) of output for the > > checklist widget from the 20080727 changes. I've uploaded a fix for dialog, > > which will presumably address this > > Thanks, I'll test it when it has hit unstable. > > > (reassigning the bug report is better than adding reports). > > Yes, but leaving one bug report in the package where user expect the bug > is less wor^W^Wbetter that reassigning and merging many bugs :)
This is up to you on the deborphan side, but please note that it's also more work for me on the dialog side, as I have to read more pages of bug logs to guess the new bug number coming from the cloning process. Also, you will have to close the bug in deborphan using a simple message, not the changelog, and the message would say something like "fixed in dialog version foo", which has nothing to do with deborphan. To summarize, for bugs which are fixed quickly like this, I think cloning is bad. Anyway, I'm going to package the new dialog today. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
