> > Shouldn't rather libgts-dev be fixed to include the gts-config binary? > > This would be the better thing to do, yes. But while gts-config is > provided by libgts-bin and while we are on freeze (maybe the release > team thinks that it is a "too disruptive" change), it isn't all wrong > to depends on B-D on libtgs-bin (at least from my point of view).
Hi. I'm maintaining gts, and I'm working on gerris too... I prepared a new package for the latest gerris release (1.3~), but it was rejected some days ago, because some licenses of the new modules aren't clear (I'm contacting working on it and contacting upstreams). gerris package on debian is outdated for more than two years, and the current package (version 0.6) isn't in a very good shape... I'm not sure if this package should be included on lenny... If you guys think this version should be included, please feel free to NMU using the Nelson's patch, because gts-config (from gts-bin) is only used by gerris, and I think is better to solve it directly on gerris for now (I will fix it on gts after the freeze). If NMUing consider fixing #350595 too... It seems like it's only needed a little change (_FPU_MASK_DZ instead of __FPU_MASK_DZ) to solve a FTBFS on m68k... Thanks a lot! Ruben Molina
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
