Matt,
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
I stil feel that splitting libgd2 this way was not the best solution, and it
continues to create more work for me and other maintainers.
I agree with you there.. it seems to have raised a few issues from
looking at the bug reports surrounding this.
I suppose this latest issue could be resolved with an alternative dependency
on libgd2-xpm-dev?
I'd think so, yes; just a dependency on libgd2-noxpm | libgd2-xpm.
That should resolve the issue with only one version of gd2 being
installable, and packages relying on one or the other.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
