Thomas Viehmann wrote:
On 2008-09-01 22:35:55.00 Tim Riker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note: the mentioned fonts are NOT included in this package.
None the less, I'll expand the mention of the copyright on the fonts
that I'm NOT including.
You have fonts in both source tarballs and ship them in
/usr/share/bzflag/fonts/
is nonempty in both the testing bzflag and the unstable bzflag-data
package.
(I'll not discuss that you shouldn't be shipping these fonts anyways but
just find them on the system it runs on.)
Surely, these fonts have copyright attached to them and hopefully some
license.
I presume you mean the png image files? These are not fonts, but images.
Fonts would have a ttf extension. Don't you agree?
Now that I had to look at your packaging again: your -data-package
misses Replaces/Conflicts with the old bzflag package, too, breaking
upgrades, but that would be another serious bug to file.
See bug #497520
--
Tim Riker - http://Rikers.org/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Embedded Linux Technologist - http://eLinux.org/
BZFlag maintainer - http://BZFlag.org/ - for fun!
☢ ☛ ¿ǝʇɐɔıʇǝu pooƃ ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ɹnoʎ uı 8-ɟʇn sı ☚ ☢
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
