On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 01:33:09PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #312714: initrd-tools: swsuspend requires an extra line in order to avoid > filesystem corruption, > which was filed against the initrd-tools package. > > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is > unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate > message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email. > > Debian bug tracking system administrator > (administrator, Debian Bugs database) > > Received: (at 312714-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jun 2005 20:18:40 +0000 > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 09 13:18:39 2005 > Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] > by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) > id 1DgTU7-0002wQ-00; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 13:18:39 -0700 > Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190]) > by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1C45C00F > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:18:04 +0200 (CEST) > Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.50) > id 1DgTTq-0000Yt-GS > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 22:18:22 +0200 > Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:18:22 +0200 > From: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Bug#312714: initrd-tools: swsuspend requires an extra line in > order to avoid filesystem corruption > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i > X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 > (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER > autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 > X-Spam-Level: > > On Thu, 09 Jun 2005, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > according to > > > > http://www.suspend2.net/HOWTO-2.html > > that's a strange piece of junk. > use it on your own risk. > > > you need this: > > > > echo > /proc/software_suspend/do_resume > > > > BEFORE the script mounts your filesystem. If the line is missing, your > > system will not resume. If the line comes after mounting file systems, > > you will most likely suffer from filesystem corruption. You have been > > warned. > > > > well initrd-tools is another piece of junk and > is on the way to be replaced.
ah - is it to be replaced with something that happily supports udev inside it? and the enabling of selinux? if there's a wish-list, i would LOVE to see proper support / detection for selinux, and the use of uclib-compiled udev in an initrd, just like there is in FC2-FC4 doing a udev-aware debian/selinux, whilst still keeping the "bog-standard-non-selinux-aware" initrd, is a complete half-way-house dog's dinner. it would actually be better, like gentoo, to _not_ have an initrd at all, when deploying udev+debian+selinux. > debian-kernel currently don't support suspend so this anyway a noop. well it is and it isn't. i would expect to be able to download the debian kernel, with its .config file, patch it, update it, compile it... yes? [i do this all the time.] so it's not exactly "a noop". l. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
