Giuseppe Sacco schrieb: > There is no specific reason to prohibit hylafax+ to get packaged in Debian. > Anyway, > it will not be hylafax package: it should be a different package that will > probably > conflict with this package sice they share a large list of pathnames.
Sure. > What would you get with hylafax+ that you are missing with hylafax? Good question. :-) We're using HylaFax+ to receive faxes via IaxModem from Asterisk (a lot of people do that) and a GUI which talks to the HylaFax+ server via the FTP-like protocol (sending, job management etc.). We tested both HylaFax 4.4.x and HylaFax+ 5.x. As far as I can remember the latter supports an extended protocol (more "jparm"s or something) which is required to store meta-data for multi-user setups. Philipp Kempgen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
