On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:43:55AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > grr. > *If* you wnat to report bugs found in an external (and bpo *is* external) > verson, please set Version: to something official (in this case: 1:2.4.1-3)
ok, I'll try to remeber that. > sorting does not work. Besides that, this BTS is not for bpo stuff. sigh - I knew I shoudn't have filed the bug.rep here, pity bpo doesn't tell where to file bpo bug - maybe /dev/null? sorry, but I'm still unclear what to do of bpo bugs, wish bpo packagers/maintainers throw in a line to state that clearly. Also, IMHO perhaps it'd be better Debian's PTS doesn't track bpo and such, if Debian's BTS can keep in sync. > 2.0.4? What makes you think it's in etchs version? Koheis comment > does not talk about etch in any way. but I do - wild guess, 2.0.4 is/was so b0rked, I've a hunch some old report I got where related. > Kohei already mailed me; but I fear it's now too late to fix that for lenny, hu? it's a P1 and won't make it into Debian? after last comment I experienced so many instances of this issue that I eventually purged OOo, and going to use rpm-to-deb from official 2.4.1, crossing fingers of course. > Anyway, the next OOo3 upload will have that fix for sure. glad to hear that - but will Etch users benefit from that as well? (hope OOo3 won't get released without that old nasty datapilot bug fixed). thanks -- paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]