On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 14:48:42 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Oh, and we already have one in 488669, but it's filed against the core > X server package. I'll leave it to the X guys to decide where to merge. > In any case it's a clear regression from etch. :( > Feel free to provide a patch, or revert the kernel changes that broke X. The X guys are not sparc porters, don't have access to sparc hardware, and the affected code is very much arch-specific.
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
